Case analysis · Litigation & decisions

Court Grants Final Approval to $1.625 Million Comodo Prerecorded Call Settlement After Nearly 10 Years of Litigation

The bottom line: on February 4, 2026, U.S. District Judge Semper of the District of New Jersey granted final approval to a $1,625,000 class settlement in Johnson v. Comodo Group, Inc., No. 16-4469. The plaintiff alleged that Comodo made prerecorded telemarketing calls to cell phones to sell its encryption software without consent, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The court also granted the unopposed motion for fees, expenses and an incentive award.

By Harrison GevirtzPublished 1 min read
On this page

The opinion is attached: Johnson v. Comodo final approval opinion.

Here is what happened

The plaintiff brought suit in 2016 under 47 U.S.C. ยง 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). He alleged that Comodo identified sales targets and called them with a prerecorded message without any consent. Comodo did not admit liability.

The litigation was hard fought. The court certified a class of everyone in the United States to whose cell phone Comodo made a prerecorded telemarketing call within four years before the complaint was filed. The court denied Comodo's summary judgment motion, its motions to strike the plaintiff's expert and its motion to decertify. The Third Circuit denied interlocutory review.

The settlement terms

According to the opinion:

  1. Comodo pays $1,625,000, and none of it reverts to Comodo.
  2. Each claimant receives a share based on the number of prerecorded calls to their number, capped at $1,500 per call.
  3. Uncashed checks fund a second distribution, and any remainder then goes to a cy pres recipient.
  4. Of 12,757 identified class members, 1,266 submitted valid claims, a 10.2 percent claim rate, tied to 4,631 calls.
  5. The average recovery was estimated at about $596.

Here is why it matters

Prerecorded marketing calls to cell phones without consent remain a textbook TCPA violation. Once a class is certified and survives a decertification motion, the defendant's options narrow. This case took nearly 10 years to resolve.

What this means for you

  1. Prerecorded marketing calls to cell phones need prior express written consent.
  2. Keep your call data. Settlements and damages are calculated from it.
  3. Class certification is the turning point. Evaluate your exposure early, not after a class is certified.

Not legal advice. TCPA.com provides general information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Do not rely on it. Verify any action with your own licensed lawyer before you take it. See our Terms of Use.

Primary sources

  1. Opinion granting final approval, Johnson v. Comodo Group, Inc., No. 2:16-cv-04469 (D.N.J., Feb. 4, 2026).
Harrison Gevirtz, Chief Strategy Officer of Ringba, Las Vegas, Nevada

About the Author: Harrison Gevirtz

Harrison Gevirtz serves as the Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) of Ringba, a call tracking and pay per call platform, and is based in Las Vegas, Nevada. Harrison Gevirtz is a serial operator in call tracking, call routing and telemarketing operations, and for the past several years he has focused on how federal regulations affect the daily operations of these industries. At TCPA.com, Harrison Gevirtz covers TCPA litigation, Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) enforcement, tech support fraud prosecutions and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rulemaking in a way that's accessible to the non-lawyer executive or compliance manager.

More from Harrison Gevirtz

Topics