Topic 04

Autodialers and Artificial Voice

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) puts its tightest limits on calls made with an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice. Those calls need consent, and marketing calls of that kind need written consent under Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules.

Autodialers after Duguid

The statute defines an autodialer by its capacity to store or produce numbers "using a random or sequential number generator" and to dial them. In Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid (2021), the Supreme Court held that equipment must have that random or sequential capacity. Most systems that dial from a stored customer list do not qualify.

That narrowed federal autodialer claims. It did not end them. Several states, including Florida, Oklahoma, and Maryland, have broader definitions that encompass automated systems for choosing or dialing numbers.

Artificial and prerecorded voices

The rules relating to prerecorded voices apply regardless of how the call is dialed.

  1. Artificial intelligence (AI) voices count. The FCC ruled in February 2024 (FCC 24-17) that AI-generated voices are "artificial or prerecorded voice."
  2. Disclosures. Prerecorded messages must identify the caller at the start and give a phone number. Telemarketing messages need an automated opt-out.
  3. Pending proposals. The FCC proposed AI disclosure rules in August 2024 (FCC 24-84). They were still proposals as of October 14, 2026.
  4. Consent level in the Fifth Circuit. In February 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the statute requires no more than prior express consent for prerecorded calls of any type.

What this means for you

Do not rely on the Duguid test alone. Check the prerecorded-voice rules, the AI rules, and state definitions. The articles in this section track every change.

The maintained guide

Autodialers, Prerecorded Messages, and Artificial Intelligence Voices

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) puts its strictest limits on two kinds of technology: automatic telephone dialing systems and artificial or prerecorded voices.

Analysis and news 12

Regulatory update · Autodialers & artificial voice

FCC Imposes $120 Million Penalty on Adrian Abramovich for 96 Million Spoofed Robocalls

On May 10, 2018, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted a Forfeiture Order imposing a $120,000,000 penalty on Adrian Abramovich, personally and doing business as Marketing Strategy Leaders, Inc. and Marketing Leaders, Inc. The FCC found that he made 96,758,223 illegal spoofed robocalls during a three-month period in 2016.

Case law 2

Supreme Court · 2021

Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid (2021)

The Supreme Court significantly narrowed the definition of what constitutes an "automatic telephone dialing system," or autodialer, under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

D.C. Circuit · 2018

ACA International v. FCC (D.C. Cir. 2018)

The D.C. Circuit reviewed a 2015 order of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) interpreting the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

Primary sources

  1. 47 U.S.C. § 227 (Cornell Legal Information Institute)
  2. 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200 (eCFR, current)
  3. Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 592 U.S. 395 (2021)
  4. Bradford v. Sovereign Pest Control of TX, Inc., No. 24-20379 (5th Cir. Feb. 25, 2026)
  5. FCC 24-17
  6. FCC 24-84