Analysis · Litigation & decisions

Spoofed Bank Caller ID and Rideshare Pickups: San Diego Bank Imposter Sentenced to 57 Months

A September 2026 sentencing in San Diego shows the full pattern: a call that appears to come from the victim's bank, a fake fraud investigation and a stranger sent to collect the victim's cards.

By Harrison GevirtzPublished 2 min read
On this page

The sentence

On September 21, 2026, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California, part of the Department of Justice (DOJ), announced that Franco Fuentes, 30, of Woodland Hills, California, was sentenced to 57 months in prison. He was ordered to pay victims more than $270,000 and to forfeit property seized from his residence, including more than $37,000 in cash and a bill-counting machine. The case number is 26cr404-BJC, and the charge was bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. Section 1344(2).

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and San Diego Police Department investigated through the San Diego Elder Justice Task Force.

How the scheme worked

According to the plea agreement as described by DOJ:

  • Fuentes and his associates called victims and falsely claimed to be bank employees investigating fraud on their accounts.
  • Victims were tricked into surrendering their bank cards, which Fuentes used for cash withdrawals and lavish purchases.
  • For one 80 year old victim, Fuentes sent a rideshare driver to her house and then used her cards to make withdrawals and purchases totaling more than $43,000, including $22,000 at Apple stores.

One victim wrote to the court that the defendant "fraudulently obtained my banking information by calling me from a phone line that appeared to have my U.S. Bank caller ID." Another victim, a 72 year old woman, lost $56,000.

In messages with a co-conspirator, Fuentes referred to victims as "vics" and boasted that the "targets are endless." U.S. District Judge Benjamin J. Cheeks called the conduct an "awful crime" and noted that Fuentes had previously received a generous resolution in state court for similar fraud.

The bottom line:

The victim statements describe spoofed caller ID displaying a real bank's identity. That single technical step made the fake fraud investigation believable and set up the in-person card handoff.

Key takeaways

  1. Caller ID spoofing of financial institutions made the calls in this case believable, according to a victim statement.
  2. The "fraud investigation" pretext turns a victim's caution into compliance.
  3. Rideshare and courier pickups connect phone fraud to physical theft of cards and cash.
  4. Repeat offenders face federal exposure. The judge cited a prior state resolution for similar conduct.
  5. Victims can report Victims should report fraud to the National Elder Fraud Hotline at 1-833-FRAUD-11 or Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3).

Not legal advice. TCPA.com provides general information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Do not rely on it. Verify any action with your own licensed lawyer before you take it. See our Terms of Use.

Primary sources

  1. DOJ, USAO Southern District of California, "Bank Imposter Sentenced for Defrauding Elderly Victims of Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars" (Sept. 21, 2026)
Harrison Gevirtz, Chief Strategy Officer of Ringba, Las Vegas, Nevada

About the Author: Harrison Gevirtz

Harrison Gevirtz serves as the Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) of Ringba, a call tracking and pay per call platform, and is based in Las Vegas, Nevada. Harrison Gevirtz is a serial operator in call tracking, call routing and telemarketing operations, and for the past several years he has focused on how federal regulations affect the daily operations of these industries. At TCPA.com, Harrison Gevirtz covers TCPA litigation, Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) enforcement, tech support fraud prosecutions and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rulemaking in a way that's accessible to the non-lawyer executive or compliance manager.

More from Harrison Gevirtz

Topics