Research resource · FCC & rulemaking

FCC Rules (47 C.F.R. § 64.1200): Research Guide

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) implements the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) mainly through one long regulation: 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200, titled "Delivery restrictions." This guide gives an overview of how the regulation is laid out, highlights the paragraphs that come up most often, and lists recent and pending changes as of October 14, 2026.

By Harrison Gevirtz4 min read
On this page

Where to read it

The eCFR is an editorial compilation. For the legal edition, use the annual Code of Federal Regulations and the Federal Register on GovInfo.

How § 64.1200 is laid out

ParagraphWhat it covers
(a)Core prohibitions: autodialer and artificial or prerecorded voice calls to cell phones and residential lines, written-consent requirements for telemarketing, junk fax rules, revocation of consent in (a)(10) and (a)(11), and exemptions
(b)Required identification and opt-out mechanisms in artificial or prerecorded voice messages
(c)Telephone solicitation limits: calling hours of 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. at the called party's location, and the National Do Not Call Registry, including the safe harbor in (c)(2)
(d)Company-specific do-not-call lists and the procedures sellers must maintain
(e)Applies the rules in (c) and (d) to wireless numbers, including text messages
(f)Definitions, including "prior express written consent" in (f)(9), "seller" and "telemarketing"
(k)When voice service providers may block calls
(l), (m)The reassigned numbers database: reporting duties for carriers and the safe harbor for callers in (m)
(n), (o), (p)Provider duties, including traceback responses and blocking calls and texts from numbers on a reasonable do-not-originate list

Paragraphs to know

Prior express written consent, § 64.1200(f)(9). An agreement, in writing, bearing the signature of the person called, that clearly authorizes the seller to deliver telemarketing calls using an autodialer or an artificial or prerecorded voice to a specified number. It must include a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the person is not required to sign as a condition of purchase. Electronic signatures count to the extent recognized under federal or state law.

Revocation of consent, § 64.1200(a)(10). As of this writing, a called party may revoke consent "by using any reasonable method to clearly express a desire not to receive further calls or text messages." Certain methods, such as replying "stop," "quit," "end," "revoke," "opt out," "cancel" or "unsubscribe" to a text, are reasonable per se. Additionally, the called party's revocation must be honored "within a reasonable time not to exceed ten business days," and the current text states that a caller "may not designate an exclusive means" to revoke. This was adopted in FCC 24-24 (released February 16, 2024).

Do Not Call safe harbor, § 64.1200(c)(2). A seller can avoid liability for an inadvertent call to a number on the National Do Not Call Registry if it meets several conditions, including using a version of the registry obtained no more than 31 days before the call and keeping records of that process.

Do-not-call requests, § 64.1200(d). The request not to receive further calls must be honored for five years from the date of the request.

Reassigned numbers safe harbor, § 64.1200(m). A caller that had prior express consent is not liable for a call to a number that has since been reassigned if it proves that it checked the Reassigned Numbers Database, received a "no" response showing the number had not been permanently disconnected since consent was obtained, and meets the rule's other conditions. The burden of proof is on the caller.

Recent changes and status

ItemWhat it doesStatus as of October 14, 2026
FCC 24-24 (adopted February 15, 2024; released February 16, 2024)Revocation rules in § 64.1200(a)(10) and (a)(11)In effect, except the "revoke all" portion, which the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau waived until January 31, 2027 (DA 25-312, then DA 26-12)
FCC 26-67 (adopted September 30, 2026; released October 1, 2026)Lets callers designate an exclusive opt-out method from three listed options, scopes revocation of informational calls to the category of call, and treats an opt-out from a marketing call as applying to all of that caller's marketing callsTakes effect 30 days after Federal Register publication. Not yet reflected in the eCFR text we checked
FCC 23-107, Part III.D (adopted December 13, 2023)"One-to-one" and "logically and topically associated" consent limitsVacated in Insurance Marketing Coalition v. FCC; removed from the rule by 90 FR 42137 (August 29, 2025)
FCC 24-17 (adopted February 2, 2024; released February 8, 2024)Declaratory ruling that AI-generated voices are "artificial" voices under the TCPAIn effect as an interpretation
FCC 24-84 (adopted August 7, 2024)Proposed rules and inquiry on AI-generated calls and textsProposal only

Research tips

  • Check the date of the calls. The rule has changed often. Use the eCFR point-in-time feature for the version in force when the calls were made.
  • Check for waivers and stays. A rule can be on the books but waived or delayed by a separate order, as with the "revoke all" provision.
  • Read the order, not just the rule. FCC orders explain what a rule means and often contain clarifications that never appear in the regulation's text.
  • Remember the courts. After McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson, courts in enforcement suits are not bound by the FCC's interpretation of the statute, and some courts have read the statute differently from the FCC's rules.

Not legal advice. TCPA.com provides general information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Do not rely on it. Verify any action with your own licensed lawyer before you take it. See our Terms of Use.

Primary sources

  1. 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200, eCFR (text as of October 6, 2026, the latest amendment date shown)
  2. FCC 24-24, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
  3. DA 25-312, Order (April 7, 2025)
  4. DA 26-12, Order (January 6, 2026)
  5. FCC 26-67, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
  6. FCC 23-107, Second Report and Order
  7. Federal Register, 90 FR 42137 (August 29, 2025)
  8. FCC 24-17, Declaratory Ruling
  9. FCC 24-84, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry
Harrison Gevirtz, Chief Strategy Officer of Ringba, Las Vegas, Nevada

About the Author: Harrison Gevirtz

Harrison Gevirtz serves as the Chief Strategy Officer (CSO) of Ringba, a call tracking and pay per call platform, and is based in Las Vegas, Nevada. Harrison Gevirtz is a serial operator in call tracking, call routing and telemarketing operations, and for the past several years he has focused on how federal regulations affect the daily operations of these industries. At TCPA.com, Harrison Gevirtz covers TCPA litigation, Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) enforcement, tech support fraud prosecutions and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rulemaking in a way that's accessible to the non-lawyer executive or compliance manager.

More from Harrison Gevirtz

Topics