News · Autodialers & artificial voice

AI Political Robocalls Without Consent? FCC Commissioner Gomez Takes a Strong Position

I don't know about you, but my phone already rings off the hook in election season. Now picture that, except the voice on the other end is AI-generated and you never said yes to any of it.

By Adam YoungPublished 3 min read
On this page

That's the issue now before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

So what happened?

On October 8, 2026, FCC Commissioner Anna M. Gomez put out a statement slamming a petition from Club for Growth, a group she called a "dark money group." The petition asks the FCC to let political groups send AI-generated robocalls to Americans' cell phones without their consent.

Here's what the petition asks for, according to her office:

The FCC's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau has asked for public comment. Reply comments are due October 19, which her office points out is just 15 days before Election Day.

What did Gomez say?

She didn't hold back.

"The FCC should not allow a dark money group to flood Americans' phones with AI-generated robocalls they never agreed to receive," she said. She also warned against changing the rules "at the 11th hour to unleash a deluge of political AI slop on their phones."

"AI slop." From a sitting FCC commissioner. Hell yes, that's a quote.

Wait, can't political groups already use AI voices?

Yes, but only with consent. Here's the thing ... according to Gomez's office, political groups can already use AI-generated voices in robocalls today, as long as they get the consent of the person receiving the call. The petition would remove that one safeguard.

And there's a legal wrinkle. Some of these protections are written into the statute itself. Her office says the FCC can't waive a statute, though it can grant exemptions. Past exemptions, for things like delivery calls, certain calls from financial institutions and health care callers, were targeted and came with conditions.

The AI voice backstory

This isn't theoretical. Gomez's office points to January 2024, when thousands of New Hampshire voters got a call before the Democratic presidential primary using an AI-generated imitation of President Biden's voice. The call falsely suggested that voting in the primary would keep them from voting in November.

What followed, per the statement:

  • A $1 million settlement with Lingo Telecom, the provider that carried the calls.
  • A $6 million fine against the consultant who orchestrated them.
  • A unanimous FCC vote in February 2024 confirming that AI-generated voice calls fall under the TCPA and are unlawful without consent, because an AI-cloned human voice is artificial by definition.

Her office also notes that reversing that interpretation would take a vote of the full Commission.

Why should you care?

Look, maybe you don't make political calls. Most folks reading this probably don't. But this matters to you anyway.

First, it's about consent. The whole TCPA world runs on one question: did the person say yes? Any exemption that chips away at that for one group of callers gets cited by the next group. Am I right?

Second, it's about the channel. Every flood of unwanted calls trains consumers to ignore their phones. If AI political calls hit cell phones by the millions in the weeks before an election, your legitimate calls get buried with them. Answer rates drop. Costs go up. It's all just simple math.

Third, AI voices are under a microscope. Regulators have already said an AI voice is an artificial voice. If you use AI agents or voice cloning in your outbound campaigns, you need consent that covers it. No exceptions.

What to do about it

  • Don't assume the rules have changed. It's a petition, not a rule. Right now, AI voice calls to cell phones still need consent.
  • Audit your AI voice use. If your dialer, IVR or "virtual agent" sounds human but isn't, treat it as an artificial voice under the TCPA.
  • Check your consent language. Make sure it clearly covers prerecorded and artificial voice calls.
  • Watch the docket. If you have a stake, the comment process is how you get heard.

I'm not going to tell you how to vote. But I will tell you this: consent is the cheapest insurance you'll ever buy. Keep buying it, OK?

You can read the Commissioner Gomez statement on AI political robocalls or the FCC page for the statement.

Not legal advice. TCPA.com provides general information, not legal advice, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Do not rely on it. Verify any action with your own licensed lawyer before you take it. See our Terms of Use.

Primary sources

  1. Office of FCC Commissioner Anna M. Gomez, news release, "Gomez Slams Push by Dark Money Group to Flood Americans' Phones with AI-Generated Political Robocalls" (Oct. 8, 2026).
Adam Young, CEO of Ringba, Miami, Florida

About the Author: Adam Young

Adam Young is a 42-year-old entrepreneur from Miami, Florida. He is the CEO of Ringba, a call tracking and pay per call platform. Adam Young has been in telecom, call routing and performance marketing for over a decade, and is the author of The Pay Per Call Revolution. At TCPA.com, Adam Young writes about the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), robocall enforcement, tech support fraud cases and what actions by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mean for companies that make calls. His goal is to help companies stay compliant and keep scammers off the phone network.

More from Adam Young

Topics